Skip to main content

Be 'Practical' With Lighting

In Hollywood cinematography, there has been a sea-change over the last thirty years or so, away from "Studio style" lighting setups, to scenes and shots motivated by practical lighting. Gone are the days when a cowboy enters a barn, turns on one single lantern, and is blasted with pure white light coming from 12 different sources. But what does that sentence mean? "Motivating light using practical sources?" It sounds confusing and jargon-esque to the uninitiated. And how does it apply to still photography..?
      To boil it down, "Practial lights" are any light sources that appear in the shot. A lamp. A streetlight. Car headlights. The idea being that if you have a person sitting next to a fireplace, or at a table lit by a lamp, that light source wants to predominate in the shot. So most of the light should look like firelight, or lamplight. And that [lighting] element should be clearly in frame. This does NOT mean that you should always rely solely on that light source. For example, sometimes you may need to add light from a flash/studio light to amp it up. Maybe the real-life lamp (or whatever) does not provide enough lumen-power. But no matter what, it should always look like that is the source of the light.
      So how do we create practical light on a budget? The bad news is that most photographers do not have the lighting kit, nor expense account, of Hollywood. The good news is that with practical lighting, that is not needed. The lights that appear "normally" in a location are the ones that are used - or implied to be used - in the shot. Let's throw out a hypothetical....

Here is a house where the homeowner has replaced all of the old incandescent exterior lights with 5000K LED fixtures. Let's say we want to capture a shot of someone in front of this house at night. Since we want to imply that the garage and porch lights of the house are the primary "lighting" of the shot, we would show them in the image.  Using them as "practicals" would be fairly easy to balance with added flash, since flash tends to be in the 5000K range as it is. So we can adjust the shutter speed, f/stop, and ISO to find the range we like, and add a little flash to fill in the shadows if desired.

Because of the 5000K color temperature, these house lights could serve as Practicals, while an added flash could fill in or serve as additional light.

In the end, we can use "real world" lighting to either illuminate, or "motivate" (meaning we mimic them) our imagery. The point is that, in the end, the result is more realistic and organic looking.
      Let me put it another way: If someone looks at the photo and thinks that it looks "easy" to recreate with nothing more than a cell phone and porch light? Then it is a success. Because... It's not that easy. Nothing that is imaginary - but looks real - ever is.


Popular posts from this blog

So... What Are You Saying?

One of my favorite lines in the film La La Land (2016) comes when Sebastian (Ryan Gosling) gets fired from his gig as a restaurant pianist. Not wanting to accept his dismissal, Seb tells his boss, "I hear what you're saying, but I don't think you're saying what you mean."  It made me think about one of the most ubiquitous pieces of advice currently being given to photographers and others in the communications fields: "Engage your audience with compelling content."  The buzz phrase "Content Driven" is bandied across the Internet, and from the rooftops of skyscrapers by everyone who communicates a message, image, or concept to an audience of any kind. We are admonished to "...Tell a story to draw your audience in," and "reach them on a deeper level."
      While I would agree that these ideas are very true, I would also say that - left without any other qualifiers - they are vague. Let me put it this way, if you had a driving…

Everything Old is New Again...

Due to events that would take far too long to explain here, I now find myself working with a camera that I have not used for more than half a decade. Granted, it will largely be used only as a back-up at this point, but the question of why anyone would 'go back' to using such "antiquated" technology as a 10-year old (at the time of this writing) digital camera that is only 12.3 megapixels and has a max ISO of 3200 has an interesting series of answers. Let me cite the method to my madness.

The camera in question is a Nikon D-90 with a vertical grip. At the time it was released it was considered a top-shelf pro-sumer model, and it was the definitive purchase that pushed me from film into digital. At 12.3MP, it was quite the heavy hitter for it's time, considering it was not all that many iterations down the line from the days of the "5MP cieling", where even high end DSLRs were still climbing out of the 3.2 range. To show you just how far things have come…

Turning Day Into Night

Shooting at night is like having a clean slate. A very challenging clean slate. Why do I say it that way? Because as far as the camera is concerned, there is nothing there. We may know there are houses, cars, or trees in that moonlit space around us - but without adjusting the ISO to extremely high (and usually noisy) levels, the camera sees a blank, black canvas. In order to make it come alive, we need to paint with light.
      In the world of big budget films, this means using huge amounts of lumens and wattage to create either a large wash of psuedo-moonlight, or pools of selective light shining on specific parts of the scene. Either way, it means having lots of lighting - and lots of power - at your disposal. Maybe. And maybe not...       There is an age old trick that has been used by Hollywood for decades, and is even seen  in large-budgeted modern films such as Jaws (1976), Peter Jackson's King Kong (2005) and Mad Max Fury  Road (2015) among countless others. In this techn…